![]() ![]() ![]() If it is important to have Frozen in the parks, figure out somewhere else that it could go, with a custom designed attraction that does the film justice. Maelstrom is no longer there and unfortunately, Epcot is a shell of what it once was. Highly recommend yesterworld and further defunctland for bits like this about other rides and parks. "You just won the Super Bowl MVP, and now you get a used, 26 year old Chevrolet Cavalier that we re-painted and replaced the tape deck with a CD player!"Įither way, leave Maelstrom alone. This was a great ride and there is an interesting history about how it all came to be. Even Tangled got a bathroom in Fantasyland.and all Frozen gets is an overlay on a 26 year old ride? That seems too little for Frozen. What EPCOT is missing is leadership who understands the value of a high quality attraction versus the perceived value of forcing some currently popular IP into an existing ride that doesn't need to be cartoonified.įrom the other side of the argument: Frozen just won best animated film.and all it would get is a rethemed ride that was built in 1988? For the Frozen champions inside Disney, they should push for a new ride somewhere that it makes sense (like Fantasyland). Some people think the ride might be announced. Everything needs cleaning and mechanical/electrical upgrades from time to time, and effects upgrades are always good, but a minute and a half of crap? No way. An ABC special about Frozen is airing on the 2nd and the future of Frozen was teased. Really? Maelstrom is a classic Disney dark ride, and it fits perfectly in World Showcase. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |